iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- From: R* P* <r*@embarqmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:08:37 -0400 (EDT)
Gesine you can already do this and I am working with Mike to get his pedigree charts there. You are just trying to do it in a way that does not work. I will explain later. Historic is a different type of classification than TB or IB. and is accomplished in other ways. The pedigree charts have been a particular interest and I have some ways to get them there but I am hoping to create some even better ways that would be more elegant in that they will display thumbnail images in the pedigree. ----- Original Message ----- Hi Robert Pries and all, OK, while you're thinking about changes to the Iris Encyclopedia, why not figure out how to make it so you can have a cultivar in more than one category? Four people have separately asked me about this -- that you can't put an iris in as both e.g. "tall bearded" and as "historic", and pointed out that this makes it a lot harder to look up historics on the encyclopedia. You could start with Mike Lowe's pedigree sheets, by just putting the pages-as-is up, somewhere in the encyclopedia. http://www.worldiris.com/public_html/Dykes_peds/Coralie.html Gesine ****************************************** > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:37:57 -0400 (EDT) > From: Robert Pries <robertpries@embarqmail.com> > Subject: Re: [iris] AIS: CAT: my wish list > > Unfortunatly the daffodil people tell me they constructed the platform > themselves and it is unique to them. This is why it is non transferable. > They apparently really know a lot about programming but are spending as > much time as they want on the daffodils and would not take on another task. > I would be delighted to find someone who had enough computer skills to help > integrate some other programs into the wiki. > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:12:46 -0400 (EDT) > From: Robert Pries <robertpries@embarqmail.com> > Subject: Re: [iris] AIS: CAT: my wish list > > Linda, et al; You have hit upon one of my dreams. I would love to see > pedigrees in the Iris Encyclopedia. Perhaps I am thinking too far ahead in > that we still have cultivars to enter. But I look at what the Daffodil > Society does and drool. They can present a tree going backward or the tree > of progeny going forward, and where they have images those appear in the > tree also. A magnificent job. > > Only just a couple of weeks ago Mike Lowe and I were discussing how to get > the many pedigrees he has worked up for historics into the wiki. > Unfortunately, as yet, I do not have a clear route as to how to integrate > these programs. I wish there was some computer nerd I could go to and say > this is what I want, how can you get me there? I contacted the Daffodil > Society and they told me they wrote their programs to fit their platform > and they would not be transferable. > > It is still a dream! I just looked at some videos this morning for a new > $500 program called Smart Draw. It looks like it could do what I want but > probably not within the Encyclopedia. There are makeshift possibilities but > so far I have not figured out how to do this with the elegance I would like. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- From: J* R* &*
- Re: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- References:
- Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- From: G* L* &*
- Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- Prev by Date: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- Next by Date: Re: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- Previous by thread: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes
- Next by thread: Re: Iris encyclopedia - some suggested changes