Re: AIS orders was AR: DORCAS AND APPIAN WAY?
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: AIS orders was AR: DORCAS AND APPIAN WAY?
- From: E* G* <e*@moose.ncia.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 13:21:30 -0600 (MDT)
Roger wrote in response to E.G.:
>I just checked with our bank and not only are you CORRECT, but guess
>what--if AIS tries to cash the check after its' 6 months date--the check
>will come back marked "stale-dated" meaning it is past the 6 months
>deadline.
>
>AND----YOU will get charged for a returned check by your bank--at least
>that's what MY bank told me and I'm sure most banks are the same. So
>all of us whose checks haven't been cashed are going to look at a charge
>because AIS is so inefficient in cashing checks!!
Whew - my bank does *not* penalize me for checks that are held by
the receiver...I double-checked that with the Bank Manager today.
I love New Hampshire...:) AIS is bemoaning the lack of funds - wait
till all the order checks become rubber checks....maybe this will
wake up the BOD...maybe not...any bets?
>AND---you can bet that if my bank charges me because AIS didn't attempt
>to cash the check within the 6 month limit, I will be sending the bill
>directly to AIS for reimbursement!!! Guaranteed!!!
Roger, you dreamer. At least you got your order.
Is this a flame? It it is, it is long overdue. OK, Tom, I'll
stop...
Chastened,
Ellen Gallagher e_galla@moose.ncia.net
