Re: CULT:HIST: See Clarence Dispatch a Borer


From: John I Jones <jijones@ix.netcom.com>

Henryanner@aol.com wrote:
>  
> that ever-amusing color classification chart in the 1939
> Checklist.  The name and address of the new membership person have also been
> added.

Ever amusing is right. This was my first foray into the '39 color chart and I
find it interesting. Definitions have certainly changed, at least I think they
have. But that generates some questions so...

In the '39 table Mike is developing at the HIPS site  

(http://www.worldiris.com/public_html/39-49_Color_Tables/39-49_CL_Color_Table.html)


at the entry for R7D (Red predominant, pink to red toned self, dark) is a
pointer to:

http://www.worldiris.com/public_html/JPEGs/Dauntless2.JPEG


My question is: What was the definition of "self" at that time ('39) that
includes what looks to me to be a bitone by todays standards. Or do we know?
Or, or...

Just musing in my torpid state.


John                     | "There be dragons here"
                         |  Annotation used by ancient cartographers
                         |  to indicate the edge of the known world.


John Jones, jijones@ix.netcom.com
Fremont, California, USA, Earth, USDA zone 8/9 (coastal, bay) 
Max high 95F/35C, Min Low 28F/-2C average 10 days each
Heavy clay base for my raised beds.
There are currently 83 Iris pictures on my Website. Visit me at:
http://members.home.net/jijones

Subscribe to iris-talk at:

http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/iris-talk

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             ** NewHoo Web Directory **
    An army of editors surfing the web for you!
               http://www.NewHoo.com/



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index