Re: SPEC: I.Foetdissima

---

• Subject: Re: [iris-talk] SPEC: I.Foetdissima
• From: G* S*
• Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 21:02:22 -0700

Paul Tyerman wrote:
> 
...
> 
> You didn't miss much.  It really is an insignificant flower.... although
> probably quite interesting if you're into muddy brown and mauve.
> Definitely grown for the leaves not the flowers.

Er, grown for the colorful seed pods?

Gerry
-- 
g*@mediaone.net
Gerry Snyder, AIS Symposium Chair, Region 15 RVP
Member San Fernando Valley, Southern California Iris Societies
in warm, winterless Los Angeles--USDA 9b-ish, Sunset 18-19
my work: helping generate data for: http://galileo.jpl.nasa.gov/

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SPEC: I.Foetdissima
    • From: P* T*

• References:
  • SPEC: I.Foetdissima
    • From: "s*"
  • Re: SPEC: I.Foetdissima
    • From: P* T*

• Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Photo colors was HIST: Pink Ruffles
• Next by Date: Re: SPEC: I.Foetdissima
• Prev by thread: Re: SPEC: I.Foetdissima
• Next by thread: Re: SPEC: I.Foetdissima