Re: REF: RIS Checklist vs. Recorder
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] REF: RIS Checklist vs. Recorder
- From: l*
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 01 16:04:37 -0000
>Would the RIS Recorder be a better source of info on newer cvs that
>rebloom?
The Recorder publishes a symposium of favorite rebloomers as voted by the
membership each year along with their zones of reported rebloom. The
Symposium includes primarily (exclusively?) cvs older than 1999, though.
The Recorder also includes articles on rebloomers in a variety of
climates, including the cold zones. It would be a better source of info
about the very newest cvs than the 1998 Checklist would be.
>when will the RIS Checklist be updated?
That I don't know. Rosalie? Charlie? How often is the RIS Checklist
revised?
Laurie
-----------------
laurief@paulbunyan.net
http://www.geocities.com/lfandjg/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
