Re: TB: Louisa's Song


John,

I have concluded that Australian-born irises aren't even eligible for 
North-Continent AIS awards.  I've based my conclusion on the fact 
that Barry Blyth's introductions are my favorite of all irises, so 
again and again I have gone from their listings in my '80s and '90s 
checklist books to the back where the awards are listed and have 
never found them.  Not ever.  Occasionally a description will mention 
that a Blyth or Grosvenor iris has received the Australian equivalent 
of the Dykes, so I guess they're supposed to be separate but (only 
roughly?) equal.

I agree.  I think that stinks.

Patricia Brooks

--- In iris-talk@y..., John Reeds <jreeds@m...> wrote:
> Someone just informed me that according to AIS rules, Louisa's Song 
(Blyth,
> 1999/2000) is not eligible for any AIS awards because it was 
introduced in
> Australia a few months before it was introduced in the US.
> 
> That's disappointing to hear.  So even if (theoretically, I'm just
> exaggerating to make a point) everyone agreed it was the best iris 
ever, it
> couldn't even qualify for the "100 most popular TB's" Symposium?  
That
> doesn't sound right.  I agree it should have to be registered with 
AIS, and
> probably compete at a disadvantage (based on first intro date 
rather than
> USA introduction); but a great iris is a great iris and should be 
honored as
> such.  I never discriminate against foreigners, regardless of their
> breeding.
> 
> John Reeds


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4.
No Minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index