RE: Re: Re: SPECIES: why here? germanica

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:49:56 GMT donald@eastland.net writes:
 
> The problem is that some contributors to the discussion 
> are not members of iris-talk.  They are members of iris-
> photos. At least Bob Pries has 
> explained why he is not a member of iris-talk and unless 
> he has changed his mind and subscribed, then I don't think 
> he can post directly and solely to iris-talk on any 
> thread.  
> 
I think you are right Donald. As I recall didn't Mr. Pries reasons have
something to do with iris-talk being too boring and too provincial for
his tastes? It's been a while ago but I'd bet it would be in the
archives.  I agree with John in that these types of discussions would be
very interesting and more appropriate for iris-talk. I briefly read some
postings on iris photos regarding "non-performers" or was it "good
performers" and wished they could have been on iris-talk. Others must
have had similar thoughts....at least John Jones.

I agree wholeheartedly with John's request and with Cathy's email
statement....we should not change the nature and substance of either list
because one person might be too lazy to relocate to the appropriate list.
And maybe Mr. Pries just needs some time and help to learn the proper use
of our lists. 

I like the lists just the way they are. Happy Gardening Friends!

Char Randall
Melba, ID

  

 

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index