Re: HIST: Swerti, the Name
- Subject: Re: [iris] HIST: Swerti, the Name
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:23:21 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 3/1/05 5:33:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
<< Cultivar names once accepted are forever no matter whether they were
misspelled or not. Today it is against the rules to make a cultivar name out of a
botanical name but before 1959 many names such as 'Spuria Maritima' were
accepted as cultivar names. >>
And here I think we also want to remember that these Check Lists are the
result of very smart people trying to sort, and yes, in some cases confer order
on, an enormous amount of literature, botanical and horticultural, some of it
predating Linnaeus by close to two centuries.
I do think we need to remember when--datewise-- the AIS system of
registration came into being and how long it took to get things running the way they run
now. A lot of the names out there were never actually "applied" for and
"approved" as such, the compilers ferreted them out of where ever they had been
published--catalogs, articles, books, going back to the Renaissance--and tried to
sort them out to see which could be said to have priority. The whole modern
system fo registration did not come into being until the mid-1920s, and it is
still subject to revisions.
Some names included in the 1929 Check List were concocted by the Registrar's
Office in an effort to establish order amid the chaos of duplicate
pre-existing names, including, probably the one Robert has mentioned, along with 'Spuria
Aurea' and such others. This practice was later abandonned. All these things
are explained in the introductions to the 1929 and 1939 Check Lists or the
early Bulletins.
I've more than once heard it said that we modern genuises are obliged to redo
this and that because the folks who made up the early Check Lists "did not
know what they were doing." I suggest that whereas they were not without fault
--nor guile --nor agendas-- to suggest that they were at sea or ignorant is
just plain codswallop.
Cordially,
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index