Re: Convention: TBIS
In a message dated 3/28/2005 1:14:55 PM Central Standard Time,
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
> I think the Iris world should know that TBIS scheduled their presentation
> at the St Louis convention the same time as the AIS tall-bearded forum. As a
> member of the convention committee I can tell you that we worked very hard to
> create a schedule with few if any conflicts. We had a room reserved at
> another time for their presentation even though they are not part of the
> convention, they were invited by us to have their convention as an adjunct to ours.
> Most people are members of both groups and would like to participate in both.
> Their behavior is an affront to our hospitality. Despite many discussions the
> TBIS insisted on being in conflict.. In Portland next year the
> Siberian/Species convention immediately follows the AIS convention. No other group it seems
> would purposely try to conflict and compete with AIS. Most but would see the
> advantage of everyone winning by cooperating. But despite our protestations
> TBIS has persisted, so now you must choose between their program, wi!
> th one
> hybridizer, and the AIS Tall-bearded forum with four internationally known,
> award-winning hybridizers. It seems rude to me that a group would have to go
> out of their way to be combative. But the iris world should be aware that it
> was not St Louis that created this problem. The truth always emerges.
>
I do not see TBIS/AIS thing as an either/or decision. Unfortunately, some of
the powers that be, do!
For me these two organizations supply different products that meet different
needs of individuals. I see little advantage/disadvantage to combining/not
combining the two. The same functions/services must still be performed.
The other crap goin' on is just that, crap!
Irises and those involved with them will be better served if both
organizations focus on what they can do effectively and work toward improving those
things.
There is a life cycle associated with all things, even voluntary
organizations. I do not wish to give up anything. I want all things I have, more, and more
that's better. You need only to visit where I live to see this. Junk, junk
and more junk layin' around. From old cars and trucks to nearly useless split
garden hoses. The point here, if there is one, is that the vehicles will not get
better unless someone works on them. If I work on one, I will likely cuss it
some as I work. Regardless, the repair will be some short of perfection. No
matter how hard I work on or cuss one of them it will not fix the other. When I
need a car, I work on it. When I need a truck, I work on it. If I fix only one
it will not adequately fill the intended function of the other.
Some see a new, bigger truck and accepting fewer miles per gallon as a
solution. I've not reached that point.
The iris world you mention recognizes most of the grievances you intimate as
conflict between egos of people in power and/or those in positions of
influence. Not as a conflict among us, the iris world. You correctly identify the
memberships collectively as the same people. We are.
I do not wish to get into the who did what to whom, whether my daddy can whip
your daddy, or what faux pas by who failed to meet our needs. Certainly a
meeting date/time nearer the midpoint of the convention better meets the needs of
more people or at least provides them more flexibility. And certainly this
should have been recognized as a need early in the planning stages.
Me personally? I cannot afford to attend a week of convention. I raise
irises. So, I will attend at a time when I can reach a reasonable balance between
irises, net friends I hope to meet in person, and irises I may never have seen.
I'll shake the hands of a few, give overdue hugs to others, and attend to a
few business matters. So, I opt to be there at the midpoint. Maybe catch some of
all coming and going. To this end the TBIS chosen date better meets my
needs.That's its duty.
I can see how it would cause you consternation as an organizer and find
myself wondering why the reasoning I outline above was not addressed early in the
process and convention organizers given more guidance from AIS in ways the
needs of its members could be accomodated in the scheduling process. That's its
duty.
Ultimately, how organizations adapt to meeting needs and the efficiency with
which they do so has great influence on the length of their life cycle and
their vitality during that cycle.
For example, I may argue with AIS operating its registration franchise as a
profit center. I certainly do not want to be without such a service or destroy
it. Nor would I want to be without the membership lists available from the
TBIS, its set aside emergency fund, or the Tall Talk publication with its defined
focus on tall bearded irises.
What if any of this would anyone wish to be without? I do not see economies
of scale improving anything at this point much beyond political nests. Not the
iris world. All (most anyway) work is being performed free by under
appreciated volunteers. This would likely be true whether there were one, two, three or
four hundred iris organizations. I remain willing to be convinced otherwise.
Perhaps you or another influential person would be willing to offer some
clearly defined, specific advantages, improved efficiencies, or significant
existing dual functions that can be eliminated beyond the cost of two stamps or
accommodating meeting times?
We, the masses, have not been served well. Politicians for whatever reason,
have failed to either understand or have chosen to ignore the value we place on
successful collaboration in meeting our needs.
I'm thinkin' more folks than myself need to spend more time fixin' vehicles
and growin' irises.
Those split garden hoses? Why someday I'll need a longer one!
Smiles,
Bill Burleson
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index