Re: Re: REF: checklist

let's have fun with a bit of nonsense:

I'd be pleased If they could also correct the spelling of my name in my first
intro:

EITJE
Lo.c Tasquier
2007 Introduction

With the checklist system, Looc has become Lo.c
If it can't come up with  o , it could at least put  i , not .

if I can't be called Looc any more, (and i can't think of any reason why
)..., I'd rather be called Loic than Lo.c  ...

Sincerely,
Looc

Ps: just have a look how this message turns out when sent on iris-talk... I'm
sure it will become unreadable... must be the same kind of machine that is
used for the checklist.
if only  my name were the only one, but many names are butchered by this
inadapted technology.


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Linda Mann
  To: iris@hort.net ; iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 5:10 AM
  Subject: [iris] Re: REF: checklist


  Sounds like access to the online checklist is working, but yes, 'they'
  are working on the checklist.  Mike Lowe (registrar), Keith Keppel and
  Phil Edinger are currently cleaning up inconsistencies and typos in
  cultivar names (main entries vs pedigree spellings).

  --
  Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
  East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.korrnet.org/etis>
  American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
  talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
  photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
  online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
  message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index