iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Iris Genetics
- From: i*@aim.com
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:49:43 -0500
I'm not sure what you mean by "uninhibited anthocyanin" When Ae is involved, some patterns can be masked, such as plicata. I have a number os such "black" and "Red" plicata genotypes that are solid colour. Generally any cartenoid adds to colour so it appears differently. These are cumulative effects, not gene interactions. A light pink will not add as much to a the overall colour apearance as a dark pink will. The falls of Staring are Ae plus anthocyanin? over a dark pink ground.? Ae? plus anthocyanin over white is dark purple. Ae? over dark yellow produces black. Hopefully this answers your questions. Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: christian foster <flatnflashy@yahoo.com> To: iris@hort.net Sent: Mon, Mar 1, 2010 9:14 pm Subject: Re: [iris] iris DIGEST V1 #1024 Cindy, Whew... you are enthusiastic. I like it. But pause, and find the posts about the AVI packets before you hang your hat on that bicolor theory. Of course, I may be misreading your enthusiasm.. Don't worry about editing my ladders with 4 or 5 tiers... I didn't know the rules.. I was guessing. Chuck, can you add more thoughts about the interrelationships of patterns. I had it in my head that certain patterns/pigments would mask others. Like maybe uninhibited anthocyanin would mask any pink even if it was genetically strong enough to express or a fully inhibited anthocyanin would fail to express any plicata family pattern. Just confirm or clarify these notions with a few examples. It doesn't really matter... but this ladder discussion is reminding me of a parakeet genetics page I once viewed... that page clearly outlined how some patterns/pigments would mask others. Now... now I'm also thinking of the color genetics of dog breeds that have the merle gene, or tri color patterns or something... a dog could be a red tricolor, but you couldn't necisarily tell that individual from a red self just by looking... All I can say is my brain's pinging, maybe if we explore a little more... whatever is in that microwave will get cooked. Christian ________________________________ From: Cindy Servis <iceboxrabbitry@hotmail.com> To: iris@hort.net Sent: Mon, March 1, 2010 7:37:06 PM Subject: RE: [iris] iris DIGEST V1 #1024 With rabbits each letter represents a "series" but they do interact with each other...how it was explained to me is that the C series controls how many units of red and black are in the coat. C full color has all of the pigments. (5 black and 4 red) (I think...it could be 5 black and 4 red cchd chin dark has (5 black and 2 red) cchl chin light has (2 black and 2 red) ch himi has 2 black and 0 red c has all of the black pigment removed from the coat and from the eyes turning the eyes red (so 0 black and 0 red). A cc albino animal can be genetically any color that isn't in this c series...black, blue, chocolate, lilac, castor, opal, torte etc. Albino only MASKS color, it doesn't obliterate the genetics of color in rabbits. The C series also affects how the agouti, self and tan rabbits look. a cchd self black looks like a seal, it turns a self black to sable with cchl, and turns a self black to himi...but with agouti, it turns the chin dark to chinchilla, the chin light to a sable chin, the himi is an agouti himi, and the white...of course is albino no matter what the animal is other wise (with the exception of any of the other dominant C genes). I raise sable points...which are aa BB cchl_ DD ee They are actually a torted sable if you compare this to the genetic ladder of dominance. Each gene in each alphabetical series is separate tho...They aren't more or less dominant from A to Z...it's just that they are each separately listed with the strongest on top and the weakest or most recessive on the bottom but only within it's series. Cchd can affect agouti...but it doesn't change the fact that the rabbit IS an agouti. Chuck states that the tangerine colors are very subtle to detect the differences in. The same is true with the C series. aa BB CC full color is hard to tell from a aa BB cchdcchd a cchl cchl is hard to tell from a cchl (ch or c). (unless you really know what you are looking at...the cchd _ and cchl cchl are VERY hard to tell apart. The ch and c are pretty apparent and different from the rest. When we are unsure of a gene, we leave the blank space until we test breed to see what the color gene is an agouti would be A_ until we bred it to a self and got either agouti, tan or self. Then we change the line to what it carries hidden. If we bred to a self and got agouti and otters, the animal would be Aat and if we bred to self and got only self and agouti it would be Aa. People used to think that the C series was "partially dominant" as well...but it turns out that it is just the mix of genes that caused the appearance. Such as cchdcchd being darker than a cchdcchl or a cchdc I won't say that this is what is happening with irises...because I have heard of partial dominance in other species before. :) Chuck states that: Where you can get shaddings of different blue is where you have Ae (anthocyanin enhancement gene, the gene that seems to be responsible for anthocyanin vascular intrusions) in various combinations with 'I'. 'I" is only partially dominant over 'Ae' so you do get various shades of blue. I also suspect that thiis is how you get the whites or near whites with dark blue beards. This is likely one Ae and several 'I" genes in combination. I immediately thought that the whites with dark blue beards may be a result of the bicolor gene. The irises with white on the top and any other color on the bottom. The base color would be a white and yellow flower which makes the blue more intense...but this was only my own observation...and I didn't know how "on" it was. In looking at different irises it appeared to me that the only colors affected in the bicolor would turn the top of the yellow flower white, or the top of a purple or blue or orange flower white. Other colors could be applied over the top of it due to genetics...but never yellow on the top with that particular mutation. The top could be turned blue or red or etc...but not yellow. I am not saying this is correct...but it was just the impression I got when comparing irises. Many that appear to have a bicolor gene, aren't classified as a "bicolor" because they aren't pure white on top due to the addition of another color. I also saw yellow topped flowers with other colors on the bottom so can't really explain this any further. When painting with an airbrush, colors are applied in transparent layers that are separated by clear. Imagine taking a white based flower, put on a layer of clear, then put on blue. There's a blue self. With the Bicolor gene, you start with a yellow flower, cover the bottom with mask and paint white on the top (or remove the yellow from the top) and then another layer of clear, then paint blue over the entire flower which would turn the top light blue and the bottom a shade of purple. Same thing goes for applying red over it instead of blue which would turn the top pink, and the bottom orange. Just an observation, I don't claim to be correct. I will do a series of digital paintings or watercolor paintings to illustrate this idea someday. I want to do it anyway, to help it make sense to me too. LOL. A bicolor with a yellow top...appears to be a solid yellow flower with something that allows other colors ONLY on the falls??? Like I said...I was unsure about this all together. Actually, with Tangerine...there would be 5 possibilities. TTTT TTTt TTtt Tttt tttt Same with the I series. IIII Self blue appearing white IIIi Very pale blue IIii medium pale blue Iiii medium blue iiii dark blue I see you also use an "X" to refer to a cross being done. So a iiiixiiii would only produce iiii babies...the only thing that would affect the color other than this would be a gene in a different series such as plicata. OOps...you had the 5 on the "I" but not on the T...sorry to point it out as if both were affected. Plicata has 4 gene possibilities...WHEW...that makes for a LOT of possible combinations! No wonder iris genetics are so hard to figure out! Tonight I am going to go on the um...pedigrees site mentioned. Provided I can find the link again. LOL. Perhaps It would be easier to just list them like this. Ugh, can anyone tell me how to keep this from going into this wide screen thing? I hate reading stuff like that myself...but don't know how to change it. Cindy _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- References:
- Re: iris DIGEST V1 #1024
- From: c* f* &*
- Re: iris DIGEST V1 #1024
- Prev by Date: Re: iris DIGEST V1 #1024
- Next by Date: HYB: February Surprise (now March Surprise too)
- Previous by thread: Re: iris DIGEST V1 #1024
- Next by thread: HYB: February Surprise (now March Surprise too)