• Subject: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
• From: C* C* <i*@aim.com>
• Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:33:17 -0500 (EST)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iris_pumila

Chuck Chapman

-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Mann <lmann@lock-net.com>
To: iris <iris@hort.net>
Sent: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 12:16 pm
Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)

criteria?  Presumably chromosome count and morphology - any DNA
comparisons yet?

Have any of pumila's closest relatives made their way into fertile TB
families?

Linda M

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
    • From: L* M* &*

• References:
  • Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
    • From: L* M* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
• Next by Date: re: Re:Auto-tetraploid versus amphidiploid was Hyb spots
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)