Iris Photos (digital cam)
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Iris Photos (digital cam)
- From: L* D* <7*@CompuServe.COM>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 16:54:34 -0700 (MST)
I find all the discussion on what technique to use in photographing irises
using todays latest technology very interesting...... Considering uses in
publishing - iris business catalogs - clipArt - Web Pages, etc......
----------------------- 0 ---------------------
I find my situation is slightly different - It is deciding between (1) a new
Digital camera - (2) a new Video camera and use it with my SNAPPY or (3)
continue to use the KONICA.Service or (4) buy a new scanner.......
1. I have used the Casio X10 (bottom of the line) and the results look very
good on the computer screen. But that's as far as I 've been able to go with
the photos.. No print-outs, etc. (still evaluating Casio)
2. I've seen iris catalogs prepared using the Video-Snappy approach and the
results are very impressive..
3. Konica is still very reasonable - but you must plan the shots ahead of time
(horizontal shots, close-ups, etc) The snapshots can then be converted to a BMP
file which have approx. 241,000 bytes. (uncompressed)
(4) I like the scanner method - but it does take up table-top space and the end
results uses lots of bytes.. (yesterday I had an iris photo scanned and it used
over 3 MEGS ! ) Even compressing won't help that much - that's a lot of
bytes... ! Most of my images scanned professionally are close to 1.5 megs +..
My new Web page uses methods 3 and 4.
** Time Began In A Garden **
Larry Doucette Wilmington, Mass.
75227.1641@compuserve.com
USDA 5B -15 F : 12 mi. North of Boston & 12 miles inland
I can also be found on our Web Page called - 'Home-Spun'
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lajean
Lost power for 10 hours last night.. very heavy winds Tree outside the
driveway fell and caused power failure through out the town... t' was quite
hectic...