Re: Wabash


Henryanner wrote:
> 
(re WABASH and its slow growth etc.)
> 
> . . . Now, I've been trying hard to keep my fresh and childish naivete about matters
> of iris genetics, but one cannot help but wonder if its being a recessive
> amoena has anything to do with this. . .

Anner and Merrily -- Of the 11 seedlings resulting from a cross between
WABASH and TRUDY, another recessive amoena, only the 11th has foliage of
"average" height. And it is an early bloomer, versus the mid-season
habits of the others. These are all hardy, however, and some are
aggressive increasers. Nonetheless, they are all on the small-rhizome,
slender stalk side of things. It's tempting to think these are recessive
amoena traits, but I have discarded most of my older ones, and can't
recall their habits.  Barry Blyth's varieties involving recessive
amoenas stick in my mind as running on the small side -- flowers as well
as plants overall. I have several more of his later introductions newly
planted which I will keep an eye on.

Griff Crump, along the tidal Potomac near Mount Vernon, VA 
jgcrump@erols.com

Griff Crump



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index