Re: CULT:Victoria Falls
- Subject: Re: CULT:Victoria Falls
- From: z*@mindspring.com (L.Zurbrigg)
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:37:53 -0500
From: z88keys@mindspring.com (L.Zurbrigg)
>From: StorYlade@aol.com
>
>In a message dated 3/23/1999 9:25:25 PM Central Standard Time,
>jcwalters@bridgernet.com writes:
>
><< Victoria
> Falls can sometimes lean here, not because of the wind, but because the
> stalks can be relatively weak for their height and the weight they bear. >>
>
>Anyone care to venture a guess (I don't have the answer to this one) as to the
>number of introductions that have Victoria Falls in their gene pool? Everyone
>was quick to 'use' the Fallen Lady. ????????????
>
>Betty in Bowling Green KY
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dear Betty: I used V.FALLS a lot when it was new. Such good growth, good
>form and lots of buds. one reason it goes over is that it has so many
>buds. I have two introductions from it at least. No problems with their
>stalks, fortunately. Lloyd Zurbrigg in Durham NC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are proud as punch of our new web site!
http://www.onelist.com
Onelist: The leading provider of free email community services