Re: SPEC: I. maackii
- To: i*@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: SPEC: I. maackii
- From: h*@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 10:45:35 EDT
Greetings.
Rosalie forwarded Clarence my post in which I offerred Dykes' observations
about I. maacki and this is what he passed along to me. I'm sure he will not
object to my sharing, especially since I've forwarded Waddick's observations
to him.
-----------------------
<< This is very interesting. I have grown seed of I. maackii twice, once
from SIGNA and once from seed obtained from St. Petersburg. Both times it
was I. pseudacorus. When the elder Regel was Director at St. Petersburg
Botanical Garden he probably had a plant of pseudacorus which has persisted.
Clarence>>
-----------------------
I --and this is Anner speaking again-- think that the most interesting thing
from the Dykes passage is the description of the pod as 'beaked', which is
not a feature of I. pseudacorus as I know it, assuming I understand the
concept of a beaked pod correctly.
Anner Whitehead
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:
http://click.egroups.com/1/3555/0/_/486170/_/957797138/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
