RE: HYB: crossing plicatas with nonplicatas


Absolutely, it might be useful in multi-generation crosses, where one trait
in a non-plic may be added to plic breeding lines, or vice-versa.  The first
year I ever tried hybridizing, I got a lot of remarkable dogs from such a
cross, though I  considered second generation crosses trying to incorporate
a light blue ground onto a dark blue plic.  I know some lavender ground
versions of this exist, but I love true blue.  None of these dogs seemed
woth the effort.

John Reeds

> ----------
> From: 	arilbredbreeder@cs.com[SMTP:arilbredbreeder@cs.com]
> Reply To: 	iris-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: 	Tuesday, May 07, 2002 9:57 PM
> To: 	iris-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: 	Re: [iris-talk] HYB:  crossing plicatas with nonplicatas
> 
> In a message dated 5/3/2002 10:30:33 AM Mountain Daylight Time, 
> jreeds@microsensors.com writes:
> 
> 
> > The biggest problem in crossing plics with non-plics is that you usually
> > (though not always) get a lot of white lines in a spray pattern around
> the
> > beard.  Not the same as in a luminata; this is usually not very
> attractive.
> > 
> But is this not a dosage indicator?  Even if the expressed trait is not a 
> desirable one, it seems that the information obtained would be useful in 
> predicting effective use of the plic/lum parent.
> 
> Sharon McAllister
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index