Re: CULT: Balloon Pods
- Subject: Re: [iris] CULT: Balloon Pods
- From: w*@watervalley.net
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:37:26 -0500
- Content-description: Mail message body
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
Unfortunately, no. I have never thought a balloon pod important
enough to photograph. :-)
In the early stages they might look like a regular pod, and during that
stage, a tag is probably the most important difference. But as the
pod grows (or in this case fails to grow), they are easy to spot.
Maybe somebody with one of those newfangled kodax can shoot
one and post it on iris-photos. My Canon Rebel is ailing.
There's a ton of balloon pod stuff in the archives.
Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS USA 7/8
On 19 May 2003 at 21:36, Showtime Farm wrote:
> walter,
>
> you wouldn't happen to be able to post a pic of an obvious balloon pod.
> I've heard the caution several times but the things that have been posted as
> discriptions of an 'obvious' ballon pod don't sound signifigantly different
> from an actual pod.
>
> christian
> ky
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS