Re: Re: CULT: # cultivars here, by decade


In a message dated 10/1/2002 12:55:22 PM Central Daylight Time, 
lmann@volfirst.net writes:


> I don't have it in a database that would make it easy to do.  And it
> wouldn't be very helpful, because of changes/improvements? in the way I
> get 'new' cultivars.
> 
> I first started collecting in the 1970s, and for several years,
> everything I got came from either Wilds (Missouri) or Rancho de la Flor
> de Lis (New Mexico?).  I ordered specific cultivars by description
> without any awareness of pedigrees.
> 

This lack of attention to pedigrees created a more or less random sample from 
that period. A necessity when attempting a statistical comparison. It has 
value.

Bill Burleson



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index