Re: REF: search help
iris@hort.net
  • Subject: Re: REF: search help
  • From: B* W* <a*@aol.com>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:48:43 -0400 (EDT)
I think I put Innerst into the search to thin them out.  May have used names
only.  Anyway, I don't believe any children of 'Over and Over' have been
registered.


<<Over and Over>>

Betty W.
KY Zone 6






-----Original Message-----
From: John I Jones <jijones@usjoneses.com>
To: iris <iris@hort.net>
Sent: Tue, Oct 19, 2010 5:32 pm
Subject: Re: [iris] REF: search help


Linda,
I don't know if this will be much help but if you separate the two
earches to just Names and another to just descriptions.
Try putting Over and Over in quotes.
I think it may be treating "and as an operator instead of a search word.
John
n Oct 19, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Linda Mann wrote:
> I tried to look up OVER AND OVER and descendants in the online
 registry and can't think of a way to get it to narrow the search to
 less than 200 or so entries.  It seems to think I stuttered and is
 giving me everything with the word "over" in it.

 Whole word match of just the names field narrows it down to 48 but
 leaves out descendants.

 Anybody have tips/suggestions on how to find any children from it
 that have been registered without having to sort thru so many
 mismatches?

 Or do any of you know of registered offspring of OVER AND OVER?

 Thanks in advance.

 Linda Mann east TN USA zone 7

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
 message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
o sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
essage text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index