REF: Re: Online verses Print

Robt R Pries wrote:

>>> My original post was to discern whether online is a real
threat to print.
I know that many people like myself would like to have both. <<<

I much, much prefer printed matter which makes me an oddity, it
seems, on this question. Yes, I 'do' subscribe to the online R &
I's but frankly use it seldom simply because I am most
interested in the recent R & I's and these are not on the online
version, yet. 

I am not complaining since I have not volunteered since I am not
good at transcribing word for word. (too impatient or too
sloppy...take your pick, they both hold true for me :-)

** John, I hate to ask this question since I think it must have
been asked and answered in posts when I took my regular hiatus
from the list. But since Arnold and Neil said there are 'no
stupid or dumb questions', I will ask. It can be construed to be
complicated but really isn't (don't think).

Query about the online checklists:

Why aren't we scanning the most recent ones? I realize the older
R & I's (especially the earliest) were not up to snuff for the
online registry...or that is what I have been told on this list
and I agree. I can't even decipher the oldest decade checklist.

Thanks for taking the time to answer,

Ellen






=====
Ellen Gallagher / ellengalla@yahoo.com /Berlin, New Hampshire - USDA Zone 3 
~~
Siberian iris mailing list archives 1999 - 2004: 
http://www.hort.net/lists/sibrob/    (1996 - 1999 messages not archived)
~~
The Society for Siberian Irises web page:  http://www.socsib.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index