Re: The bright new stars

In a message dated 96-09-14 22:50:11 EDT, you write:

>Personnaly, I would describe "new" as within the last 5 or 6 years.  "Best"
>would have to be those iris that do well for me.  This means increasing,
>blooming, holding their flowers in our heat and winds, that sort of thing.
> Although we have 4 acres of land I do not intend to weed and feed an iris
>that doesn't "do".  Nor, am I one to pamper most of my iris.  The beardeds
>have to make do with what they get.
>Back to the point, my search produced a list of 235 iris that meet the "new"
>criteria.  I weeded it down to 13 TB's and 9 SDB's. 

Dana - thanks for posting the list - I think this kind of info is interesting
to a lot of us who want to know about vigor of many new varieties.  When you
say you don't pamper, have you cloroxed or Cometized any ot the 22 you named?
 Do you have a list of all 235 with notes on how they have done for you and
would you be willing to share?

Linda Mann lmann76543@aol.com east TN USA zone ?6-8?
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index