RE: CULT-Borer--other plants attacked
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: RE: CULT-Borer--other plants attacked
- From: "* M* <M*@fin.gc.ca>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:37:55 -0600 (MDT)
I will have to read up on the columbine borer. I had always thought
that it was different from the iris borer.
Maureen Mark
Ottawa, Canada
-----Original Message-----
From: Henryanner@aol.com [SMTP:Henryanner@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 1997 1:57 PM
To: Mark, Maureen; Multiple recipients of list
Subject: CULT-Borer--other plants attacked
Bill Shear wrote:
<< Since iris borers are highly specific to irises, >>
Maybe not. I think we've become so dependent upon the
folklore of the borer
and the chemical approach to its control that we may
collectively have
forgotton some things.
In Cornell Extension Bulletin 112, "Bearded Iris: A
Perennial Suited to all
Gardens", by Austin Sand (1925), the following sentence
is found on page 51:
" Grace Sturtevant reports injury to lupines,
columbines, bleeding hearts,
and especially Aquilegia chrysantha by this same
insect".
Plants of the semi-shade with enlarged root crowns.
Natives, or plants with
close native relatives, depending upon what species she
was refering to.
This very valuable publication is now available from
HIPS, the Historic Iris
Preservation Society, for eight dollars, postpaid. Best
book money I've spent
in a long time. Order from:
Ruth Simmons
Route I, Box 67
Walters, OK 76572
Anner Whitehead, Richmond, Va
Henry Hall henryanner@aol.com
