Re: Must one plant a redwood at all? WAS RE: Responses to Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel'
- Subject: Re: Must one plant a redwood at all? WAS RE: Responses to Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel'
- From: C* M* <c*@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:45:13 -0800
As some of you know, I spent many years serving on my local city's planning commission. It was always interesting that although we spent considerable time examining setbacks and "solar planes" of buildings in enable to provide light and privacy for neighboring homes, trees and other landscaping were never included in plan approvals. Now there is one legal instance in which trees are being considered in determining a neighbor's rights to light. The info below is from the San Jose Mercury News. If you'd liked to read the whole article, go to http://www.mercurynews.com/ and do a search on solar and trees (you may be required to register, that's why I've included some of the story below). This change in approach may have ramifications for those who plan and install landscaping. This particular instance relates to installation of solar panels but as you see, the "obscure state law" generally protects a homeowner's right to sunlight. Carol
|
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Must one plant a redwood at all? WAS RE: Responses to Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel'
- Next by Date: Re: Comarostaphylis and Xylococcus
- Previous by thread: Re: Must one plant a redwood at all? WAS RE: Responses to Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel'
- Next by thread: Re: Must one plant a redwood at all? WAS RE: Responses to Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel'