RE: Low plants for under deciduous trees
- Subject: RE: Low plants for under deciduous trees
- From: &* <n*@roadrunner.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:29:53 -0800
|
Thanks to David, Gill, Joe, and Nan for your
responses. I've forwarded them to my friend. Regarding Joe's suggestion to get rid of all the grass,
oh, how I agree! How can we persuade others to that point of view? Here
is the mentality we are dealing with: Last year's community beautification award winner was a
new public school. As is typical here, it is surrounded by a chain-link fence. The
3-4 meter strip between the fence and the sidewalk is planted with grass. And a
few shrubs. On this grass the children will never play due to the fence. The
grass exists only for visual purposes. Here we are in an area where our
farmers had to cut water use by 30% last year and barring a March Miracle in
the Sierra Nevada, even greater cutbacks are to come. (Many of our farmers
raise avocados, which are so intolerant of irrigation interruption that the
best strategy is to remove 30% from production by stumping rather than water
all of them 30% less.) In spite of the resulting financial hardship, we as a
community thumb our noses at a significant proportion of our population by not
just tolerating but actually rewarding wasting water on grass no one uses. Nancy From:
owner-medit-plants@ucdavis.edu [mailto:owner-medit-plants@ucdavis.edu] On
Behalf Of Joseph Seals
|
- References:
- Re: Low plants for under deciduous trees
- From: J* S* &*
- Re: Low plants for under deciduous trees
- Prev by Date: Re: Low plants for under deciduous trees
- Next by Date: anyone growing Pistacia terebinthus?
- Previous by thread: Re: Low plants for under deciduous trees
- Next by thread: RE: Low plants for under deciduous trees