More plants -- are they "good"?
- Subject: More plants -- are they "good"?
- From: Joe Seals g*@yahoo.com
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:24:21 -0800 (PST)
As a continuation of my study into "plants that deserve to be in the trade", I offer this new list (another baker's dozen):
Cupressus sempervirens horizontalis
Halimium atriplicifolium
Cyclamen rohlfsianum
Diospyros lotus (outside the Med.)
Backstonia perfoliata
Convolvulus lanuginosus
Scabiosa crenata
Galega pratensis
Tulipa orphanidea
Leucojum trichophyllum
Narcissus elegans
Iris planifolia
Romulea bulbocodium
Have any of you grown any of these? Did you find them satisfactory?
Do any of you have any other experience with them (in the wild?) and found them wanting in some way as garden plants?
What insight can you offer as to the garden-worthiness -- or UNworthiness -- of these goodies?!
Marketing factors aside this time.
Thanks,
Joe
Joe Seals
Santa Maria, California --
where the weather is always perfect
and my NEW garden will soon be blooming and full of birds and butterflies
- Prev by Date: Re: suggestions for a visit to the Languedoc region in France
- Next by Date: Re: More plants -- are they "good"?
- Previous by thread: suggestions for a visit to the Languedoc region in France
- Next by thread: Re: More plants -- are they "good"?