Re: Lawns
- To: m*@worldnet.att.net
- Subject: Re: Lawns
- From: C* D* <c*@fix.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:15:30 -0800
> >Why not tax people who have lawns - double the amount if
>there is one in =
>>front and behind the house?
>>Future generations will wonder at our arrogance - wasting
>water, =
>>fertilizer, oil & gasoline,
>
>Hmmm.
>
>We complain bitterly when homeowner associations and
>neighborhood yard vigilantes try to stop us from gardening
>with drought-tolerant plants. We say they should mind their
>own business and respect our right to landscape the way we
>want to.
>
>Then we turn around and try to eliminate their lawns.
>
>Two sides of the same coin. If we try to force our tastes
>on 'them,' they are sure to impose theirs on us.
>
>I think we should do this through persuasion and gentle
>education, not regulation. If water and fertilizer are
>precious, let's tax them directly and let people make their
>own decisions about how to spend their money.
>
>Mike
>San Jose, CA (zone 9, min temp 20F)
+++++-----------------
Hear! Hear! ---Chas---
******************************************************************
It's possible to disagree without being disagreeable.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles E. Dills 1371 Avalon San Luis Obispo CA 93405
[Mac] cdills@fix.net 805-544-1731 FAX 805-785-0713 (new)
cdills@fix.net http://www.fix.net/~cdills/ No size limit.
I now have a domain name www.charlies-web.com
Eudora 1.5.4 Netscape Navigator 3.0 Pagemaker 6.5
Photoshop 5.0 Microsoft Word (Mac) 6.01 System 7.6.1
I can be forgetful. If I fail to do something I promised, tell me!
******************************************************************