Re: Odontonema strictum or Firespike
- Subject: Re: Odontonema strictum or Firespike
- From: T* R*
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:54:13 +1000
This has been grown for many years in
coastal New South Wales and shows no sign of becoming a weed (at least in my
area, around Sydney, though sometimes it persists on former garden sites, or
where garden rubbish was dumped) -- but then we lack its hummingbird
pollinators. All the same, I would have thought that trees and shrubs that are
weed threats in Miami/Dade County are unlikely to be so in southern California,
because of the vastly different climate and soils.
What has been known as O.
strictum here is a shrub usually no more than about 6 ft high, forming
a thicket of stems that may in time expand to 8 ft or more across, though it's
not what I would call invasive. The flowers are a brilliant deep scarlet.
But there is something of a taxonomic tangle. One Central American
flora in the 70s lumped O. strictum under O. callistachyum.
But more recent flora writers lump it under O. tubaeforme, while
recognising O. callistachyum as a different species. See Missouri
Botanical Garden's database at http://mobot.mobot.org/cgi-bin/search_vast for
the technical details. So I'm not sure what is the current status of the
plant I know, but I suspect that the species in its broad sense is rather
variable and the one I am familiar with represents just one clone among
many.
Tony Rodd
botanical consultant
Sydney, Australia
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Odontonema strictum/O. calystachyum
- From: d* f*
- From: d* f*
- Re: Odontonema strictum/O. calystachyum
- References:
- Odontonema strictum or Firespike
- From: e*
- From: e*
- Odontonema strictum or Firespike
- Prev by Date: Odontonema strictum or Firespike
- Next by Date: Re: Odontonema strictum/O. calystachyum
- Previous by thread: Odontonema strictum or Firespike
- Next by thread: Re: Odontonema strictum/O. calystachyum