Let me add to my "tirade"...
THE ISSUES WITH DRIP IRRIGATION (what I hand out at
sustianability seminars and classes):
-- a survey of
landscape professionals and homeowners noted "drip irrigation"
as the highest maintenance of irrigation systems; it requires constant
monitoring. Although some may find drip
systems "easy", the numbers don't allow me to recommend it.
-- most maintenance people are not familiar with
drip system repair and maintenance nor even simple scheduling – there
are too many different systems.
-- and less familiar are home-owners.
-- for most efficient use, systems require pressure
regulation (usually pressure reduction); a bit of information rarely shared
at purchase.
-- often shoddy products. (Yes, there are
quality products available but that's not what people who are looking at
"drip" as a cheap system are looking for.)
-- products are constantly being introduced, often
disappearing after a few months; failed products and systems, hence, become
hard to replace or impossible to find or repair.
-- small tubing often becomes clogged from hard
water (although new designs include filters and self-flushing emitters (at a
cost). Obvisouly not a problem in
the wodnerful-water areas of Northern California
(where I used to live and have forgotten about).
-- the tubing is unsightly.
-- and because it's unsightly (granted, a subjective
judgment), tubing is often covered by mulch or plant foliage, making it
difficult to monitor the effectiveness of the system. Most gardeners,
amateur and professional, often aren't aware of a clog in the system or other
maintenance issue until the affected plants begin to show signs of stress.
-- easy prey for wayward mowers and other garden
tools
-- easy prey for kids and pets
-- easy prey for rodents
-- easy prey for vandalism.
-- provides no cooling effect during hot spells.
-- does not wash off foliage as do sprinklers.
As I said in an earlier message, getting water on foliage is a good thing.
-- the vast majority of our weeds in Mediterranean
climates are cool-season weeds -- the kind that come up with winter
rains. Even with a drip system, we still get these cool-season weeds.
-- salt build up at perimeter of wetted area; such
minerals aggravate most root-rot organisms. Again, not a problem in the wodnerful-water areas of Northern California (where I used to live and have
forgotten about). Jan: I'm not sure of your research -- I haven't seen
it -- but there's plenty of research that shows this salt issue and the
connection to root rot. And could it be that the water where I live is
much harder than yours and that's why I see the salt build-up?
-- it’s often necessary to run it long to
provide “deep” watering and consequently creates a long-term
low-oxygen environment.
-- does not push oxygen into the soil.
-- Because the wetted area is much smaller when
delivered by drip compared to sprinklers, control is more critical in
application of water to avoid plant stress.
-- a recent evaluation of landscape drip irrigation
systems revealed an average uniformity of less than 20% (> 70% is
acceptable efficiency).
-- one peculiar disadvantage to drip systems:
gardeners often replace plants that have died at the end of a drip system
tube by placing a new plant in the exact same place as the existing tube end
– regardless of the type, needs, or eventual size of the new plant.
And Jan, just because "drip" has become
"standard" anywhere, doesn't make it effective nor appropriate.
Many Claifornia cities are mandating it -- along with banning lawns.
It's popularity is primarily because it is easy to install -- as the
ads state: anyone can do it. Traditional irrigation systems required
good planning, quite a bit of math, some engineering and a good deal of
sweat. Secondly, drip systems are now available in "popular
level" packaging and are sold quite inexpensively; of course, these are
the "cheap systems" I mentioned above.
Here's some bottom line -- although I have yet to
see David's garden/landscape, I have seen many now-neglected or even
abandoned gardens that were on drip and many that were on traitional
irrigation. I can honestly tell you that those that were watered on drip
would not end up on any magazine cover.
And in talking with many friends and associates who
are contractors or actually in the irrigation business (including drip
manufacturers) and still promote drip, all of them agree that drip has had
and still has its issues and, they say, they're "now making them more
like traditional irrigation systems". And I ask them, "Why not,
then, use traditional irrigation systems"?
I suppose that all irrigation systems have their
failings. I find that in 90% of the cases, it's "operator error".
Joe
Joe Seals
Horticultural
Consultant
Pismo Beach, California
Home/Office: 805-295-6039
--- On Sun, 7/19/09, david feix <davidfeix@yahoo.com>
wrote:
From: david feix <davidfeix@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Watering in Summer
To: "Plant Forum Mediterranean" <medit-plants@ucdavis.edu>,
thegardenguru@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, July 19, 2009, 8:35 PM
While I find several points Joe states that make sense, I find the
"tirade" against drip irrigation a bit too general in the points it
makes to hold water.
|