Re: Trachelospermum
- Subject: Re: Trachelospermum
- From: &* G* <p*@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:36:53 -0700
- Content-disposition: inline
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VMPopDRowBuG0JcASmNEK/8Ny0sEsu/ZMN0ik8j4OrRApJN+iEcOW3lilJTcVryRT0z767tGb+rCLE/GQuJppvhDY4rKEEhPqnFjMaBoaRVOJTfixvIuRA+2lGvcdSMrTR4tmrcX15iynUDCvaF7zcO7FH2LgblLPZp4kgpeAyk=
On 6/8/07, Cali Doxiadis <gastouri@ker.forthnet.gr> wrote:
As far as perfume goes... I find both pleasant with no
hint of dog urine.
I'm one of those who isn't a fan of Trachelospermum jasminoides
because I find the scent rank, or at least cloying and heavy, similar
to how I perceive the scent of poison hemlock (which is cloying,
heavy, and sickeningly nutty to me).
