V. major/minor
- Subject: V. major/minor
- From: V*@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:49:23 EST
I have read the various discussions, information, and debates your Q raised, Pam, and have found the responses fascinating. Anthony's delighted me esp.; my own background is in Medieval English Literature so it was fun to see old friends referenced and quoted. And since my brother is a/an historian, I forwarded it to him. Response: "I LOVE things like this! THIS is why I became a historian."
BUT: My real thought was the possibility that no answer will be found in early printed sources, ie pre-Linneaus [What pictorial resources exist?] . Earlier classification systems existed, to be sure, but they would have been made upon different criteria, eg poisonous/nonpoisonous; medicinal benefits or lack thereof; utility value, and the like. I read somewhere that ancient Egyptians classified papyrus spp. [actually, "reeds" generally] on the basis of their possible utility as writing materials....
This adds nothing to the discussion; just thought I'd toss it in.
Jill [Van Cleve]
San Diego, CA
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: V. major/minor
- From: A* L*
- From: A* L*
- Re: V. major/minor
- Prev by Date: Vinca major or minor?
- Next by Date: Re: V. major/minor
- Previous by thread: medlar, Mespilus germanica
- Next by thread: Re: V. major/minor