Re: White list concerns
Mike and others,
May I remind you that this issue has been discussed for at least the
last two years and probably longer, so I don't see that it has
anything to do with "lame duck presidents." We have discussed this
topic ad nauseum. I agree with your suggestions but if no one has
anything more concrete to add, can we let it go and move on?
Nan
>
>There's a long history in the US of lame duck presidents
>enacting a lot of rules by fiat after the election is over.
>I think we're heading for that in this case. That means
>there's not much time left to protest. There has been a
>quiet campaign to build support for white list regulations,
>including the placement of an article in Business Week of
>all places a couple of months ago. They're usually very
>skeptical about government regulations, but when you attach
>the label "environment" to something a lot of reflexes seem
>to be paralyzed.
>
>It's a pity. In pursuit of a noble goal, I think we're
>headed for a solution that's like treating an infected
>toe with high amputation.
>
>Mike
>San Jose, CA
