Re: take pity...


On 10/18/05, at 9:53 AM, Charles Dills, <charlesdills@mac.com> said:

>             The notion that everybody on the forum has to conform to  
>the lowest power machine that tunes in is ludicrous. I agree, there  
>are some limits on size but let's exercise limits in both directions.  
>There ought to be an agreeable minimum size. I do post pictures on  
>two other forums and on my web page. My lower limit is 4 x 6 inches  
>at 72 dpi.

File size is more important that physical dimensions.

>             If a person cannot receive these then whose fault is it?  
>There are many ways to boost a person's computer capacity. If a forum  
>like this is important to a person, then they should make the  
>provision necessary so they can enjoy it.

Seems more like common courtesy to me to be concerned with the many,
many people who have slow connections. It's not computer capacity but
the internet connection speed. Some people may not have the choice of
getting a speedy connection and there are others who may not be able to
afford one even if it's offered.

 
Tom Miller
..................................................
If you like tropical plants like hibiscus, please see:
<http://trop-hibiscus.com>
..........................................
"The only time we see the middle of the road is as  
we run from side to side." R.O.Clark 
...................................................




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index