Re: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- To: perennials@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- From: D* S*
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:33:48 -0400
|
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000 23:46:15 -0600 connie hoy <coneh@uswest.net>
writes:
> (I dont recall ever hearing of a dog being crossed with a cat for > example let > alone a fish)When odd ball crosses did occur i.e.a horse to a mule > the mule > is sterile Connie --
One point of correction: a mule is the result of a mating between a female
horse and a male donkey (jackass, burro, etc.). The offspring of a male
horse and a female donkey is called a hinny. For, um, (logistical?)
reasons hinnys are seldom produced. As I said in a previous post, that
mules/hinnys tend to be sterile at all is the oddity. Many, many
(most?) hybrids are quite fertile. Lion/tiger hybrids, for example, are
fertile, and almost all of our domestic cattle breeds are the result of
crossings between different species as well as selective breeding.
When we're talking about something on a genetic level, this is really
getting down to the building blocks, the ingredients, of
life. Geneticists are working with bits and pieces of matter the same
size or smaller than individual cells. These microscopic bits of the
Universe aren't "pigs" or "cucumbers," they're "Gene 2041 which is
resistant to Fusarium Wilt" and so forth. It's all being done on
microscope slides, goats aren't being forced to mate with tomatoes or anything,
this isn't Dr. Frankenstein combing the cemeteries for parts (at least that
anyone's making public...).
A lot of this genetic manipulation -- in the modern sense -- has been going
on for quite some time. For example, the "citronella" scented geranium was
originally created years ago with cell injections from citronella grass --
the two species are considerably more distant in relation than dogs and
cats.
One wonders why the American Society of Landscape Architects is having
these kinds of concerns. I would suspect that some person(s) is
infiltrating their specific political views into this organization. Seems
like it would be more appropriate in a more relevant arena. Plenty
of things the ASLA could be worrying about, such as their use of proven invasive
plants like Russian olive. Almost reminds me of the "vegetarians" who wear
leather and live in houses held together with "glue factory" adhesives.
As the saying goes, just my two cents.
Dean Sliger
Warren, Michigan, USA
Zone 6B
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- From: "B* P*"
- From: "B* P*"
- Re: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- From: c* h*
- From: c* h*
- Re: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- From: "d*"
- From: "d*"
- RE: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- Prev by Date: Re: small daylilies
- Next by Date: Re: Hollyhock seed
- Prev by thread: Re: Gene Modified ornamentals?
- Next by thread: Re: Gene Modified ornamentals?