Re: water, water
- Subject: Re: water, water
- From: E*@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:37:43 EST
In a message dated 2/19/03 3:52:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, llmen@wi.rr.com
writes:
> Well, that's certainly better than the 1.6 gal/flush that is the
> standard low flush model that's currently available. I'm all for
> conserving water, but the low volume sometimes creates, um...
That statement alone is reason for the usually quiet Ed to make a long, long
speech which I have heard so many times - referred to as permanent employment
for plumbers. It is not unheard of here for folks to sneak over the border
into Canada and smuggle a WC back.
Claire Peplowski
NYS z4
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PERENNIALS
