Schmid book on shade
- Subject: Schmid book on shade
- From: E*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:51:24 EST
I have George Schmid's "An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials" to look and
offer comment for a group discussion. I am taking a pass on this book.
Anybody else have a good look at this 49.95 book?
It is heavy on Hosta and ferns. It is primarily a book aimed at states below
the Mason-Dixon line. The illustrations are nearly all plants known to
gardeners who would shell out 50 dollars for a reference with the less well
known plants not in the pix section. Missing entirely are all woodland
phlox, digitalis, species hems, lilies that ARE perennial, many other plants
that bloom. Schmid calls lilies annuals. Good old feverfew, a plant that
will help out any shaded area is entirely bypassed. Many other common plants
are there. Not being a shade gardener exclusively, it seems to me that books
on this subject usually make an effort to get some color into the garden.
Failing that, they make an effort at composure of foliage plants in the
garden, a very good subject.
I did not expect low rainfall areas to be represented but 90% of the book
buying public live on one coast or the other and one half the East Coast is
cold. Tropical or Gulf coasts are not there either. Maybe this book should
have been My Georgia Shade Garden. He often says this condition or that
plague is "reported" but never seen by him in his garden. For instance the
Pulmonaria are all fine in George while they in much cooler New York collapse
from mildew regularly. That one species never does is not mentioned. There
are many issues in this book that are not explored when the issue is a common
problem with a described plant. Dr. Schmid has not seen the catalog of
insect life that plagues my area. The Japanese beetle does virtually no
damage in the shade for instance, not known to him.
Schmid also states that some of the plants he deals with are summer dormant.
Some of those are absolutely not summer dormant in the Northeast. He,
obviously good gardener that he is, admits in several places that he has
pinched, removed in part and appropriated plants from public places. I would
not comment on a snipped cutting here and there, the best of us (Christopher
Lloyd for one) have shyly admitted to this but not in a book intended to be
reference on your keeper shelf.
Another point which rankled me is his explanation that he will not be using
Latinate terminology. The example given is that cordate will not be found as
heart shaped is easier on the ear for most of us. The use of a glossary is
not offered and does not appear in this book.
Now those who love this book can give me differing point of view. I tried to
find a better reason to spend fifty dollars (much less already on many seller
sites) but could not. There is a smaller paperbound shade gardening book for
those of practical nature that is a filled with practical information for
less than ten dollars, "Easy Care Shade Flowers" by Patricia A. Taylor.
Beyond that I would spend my money on a monograph for a genus I liked.
This is a Timber Press book. That would be the same Timber Press that has
been announcing annually that an update of Dr. Schmid's Hosta book is on the
way. Nearly ten years now.
I should add that I have Schmid's book on Hosta and the two do not compare.
Claire Peplowski
NYS z4
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PERENNIALS