Re: Digiplexis
perennials@hort.net
  • Subject: Re: Digiplexis
  • From: G* R* <g*@grahamrice.com>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:36:46 -0500

Title: Digiplexis
Can I just clarify the name of this plant? The name "Digiplexis" is a made up trade mark. Isoplexis canariensis was reclassified as a Digitalis some years ago so this hybrid is actually a Digitalis - D. canariensis x D. purpurea. The first one to be launched here in the US is Digitalis Illumination Flame ('Harkstead Flame') (below); three others have been launched in Britain. There's more info on two of them here:



As I say, Digiplexis is an invalid and unnecessary name.

Allbest,

Graham Rice





On Feb 7, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Don Martinson wrote:

I’m very intrigued by a new plant appearing in catalogs this spring.  Digiplexis,  a bi-generic cross between Isoplexis, native to the Canary Islands and Digitalis.  It is listed as hardy to zones 8-10, but I would need to use it as an annual here in Wisconsin, although I might try to overwinter it in my glasshouse.
 
My concern/question is that the plant apparently needs vernalization at temperatures below 50F (10C) for at least 4 weeks in order to set flower buds.  Few of the catalogs offering Digiplexis indicate if the plants they are selling are vernalized or not (or should I assume they are?).  One site selling plugs to commercial nurseries does address this, but I would only be interested in a single plant, expecting it to bloom this year.  If worse comes to worse, I’ll probably ending up calling the nurseries and speaking with someone in a technical capacity to answer this question.
 
Anyone here have any words of wisdom?


-- Don Martinson
   Milwaukee, WI

"If you are not killing plants, you are not really stretching yourself as a gardener."
   ~J. C. Raulston





Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index