Re: glyphosate
- To: prairie@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: glyphosate
- From: Tim & Carol Kiphart kipharts@comwerx.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 17:07:26 -0500
- References: 001101c0be1d$f64dd980$2c0dfea9@chico>
|
Firstoff, with the exotics you have listed there really is no such thing
as "selective" spraying, you are talking about huge areas. Secondly, better
living through chemicals does not address the real issue. It is simply
treating an effect not a cause. That is weeds, exotic or not, invasive
or not, are not the "cause" of anything they are an effect (or response)
and treating them chemically isn't going to change that. Success will only
happen when we deal with the underlying reasons for the weeds. The current
approach totally ignores ecology and its principles.
The active ingredient glyphosate has been shown to alter the soil microbiology, not necessarily all in a bad way. Inotherwards, a healthy soil should be able to deal with the chemicals and come back into homeostasis. But if these areas were healthy, then would there be a need for Round Up or any other chemicals? Both fungi and bacteria are affected. I have been told by a noted soil microbiologist that certain bacteria utilize glyphosate as a food source. HERE IS THE KICKER THOUGH: mounting scientific evidence is showing a link between the "inert" (unlabeled) ingredients in Round up and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. Best of luck, Tim
Ed and Gale wrote: We belong to an environmental group and are currently in the middle of a |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: glyphosate
- From: "M* S*"
- From: "M* S*"
- Re: glyphosate
- From: J* S*
- From: J* S*
- Re: glyphosate
- References:
- glyphosate
- From: "E* a* G*"
- From: "E* a* G*"
- glyphosate
- Prev by Date: Re: glyphosate
- Next by Date: Re: glyphosate
- Prev by thread: Re: glyphosate
- Next by thread: Re: glyphosate