This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: need for coordination

> A new listserve has been set up to handle the traffic related to that
> coalition.  I'm personally sorry that we now have two different national
> prairie listserves, but for those of you interested in keeping up with
> this coalition, send an email to prairies-subscribe@egroups.com.
> 
> Would you like to ask the coalition to move their coalition discussions
> to this listserve, or would you prefer they be kept apart?

Hi Lee,

   When I set up this list back in January, 1997 it was with the intent
   of helping with everything prairie-related: increasing people's 
   awareness, providing a reference for restoration projects, management
   issues, and botany and ecology.  

   I think expanding that vision with an eye to the future is a Good
   Thing (tm).  Taking an active role in issues that will affect tomorrow's
   prairies (not to mention today's) can only help.

   As long as the coalition discussions are productive and aren't reduced
   to name-calling, they could be a great addition to the list.  One issue
   though -- can anyone inject comments into the coalition's issues?
   Or will they just talk amongst themselves with the existing list
   members acting as silent observers?  The latter sounds kind of silly
   and pointless to me.

Chris

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index