This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: need for coordination geoff says

>coalesce them
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lee Stone <leeprairie@austin.rr.com>
>To: prairie list serve <prairie@mallorn.com>
>Date: Sunday, August 13, 2000 2:28 PM
>Subject: need for coordination
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>During the North American Prairie Conference, about 200 people attended
>>a special meeting to talk about the ways in which the current Farm Bill
>>harms prairies. It was decided to form a prairie coalition in order to
>>better represent prairie issues in the new Farm Bill that is being
>>developed.
>>
>>A new listserve has been set up to handle the traffic related to that
>>coalition.  I'm personally sorry that we now have two different national
>>prairie listserves, but for those of you interested in keeping up with
>>this coalition, send an email to prairies-subscribe@egroups.com.
>>
>>Would you like to ask the coalition to move their coalition discussions
>>to this listserve, or would you prefer they be kept apart?
>>
>>lee stone
>>Native Prairies Association of Texas
>>boardmember
>>Austin, TX
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
>>message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
>message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE

Response:  Keep the coalition discussion in our current listserve, do not
move to a separate listserve, such will allow for our input and for us to
keep up with coalition discussion.
Clifford W. Welsch, Ph.D. (Michigan)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index