This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: ?
- To: prairie@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: ?
- From: "* C* T* <j*@ridgway.mobot.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:09:18 +0000
Brett Roberts -- Thanks for the correction to my not-so-carefully
considered statement about the relationship between corn and soybean
acreage and original prairie acreage. Points well taken! (relevant
quotes edited below, for all concerned) -- James T.
> James C. Trager wrote:
> > Also, a good estimate of the past extent of prairie might be
> > arrived at by getting the figures on corn and soybean acreage, since
> > it's mostly original prairie that has ended up with that present
> > fate.
>
> The present acreage of corn and soybean acreage would overestimate the
> acreage of original prairie. There is a vast amount of land that is now
> devoted to these two crops that formed under forest vegetation. The
> best way to get accurate figures is to consult soil surveys and
> determine the acreage of soils classified as "Mollisols" these soils
> formed under prairie vegetation.. Much of our corn and soybean acreage
> is grown on "Alfisols" and were formed under forest vegetation.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index