This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: riparian vegetation response summary
- To: prairie@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: riparian vegetation response summary
- From: "* C* T* <j*@ridgway.mobot.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:02:39 +0000
I have read "Miracle under the oaks", which is a fair bit of
journalism, but does have some of the faults you mentioned. But I was
refering to a distinct project, on the grounds of the Chicago Botanic
Garden, along the Skokie River, as an example of riparian prairie
reconstruction.
I'm not entirely comfortable with the statement that Steve Packard
"invented a non-existent biome", unless you meant to say
"reconstructed a no-longer-existing ecosystem". The system in
question (bur oak - tallgrass savanna) has a pretty good basis in
empirical (historical, old journal and natural history) evidence, and
now, based on a couple of decades of restoration activity, in
practical and experimental evidence, as well. It is not exactly a
riparian community, since it occurs (in somewhat different versions)
both within and out of river floodplains, indeed over a greater area
of mesic and even sandy upland than in floodplain proper.
Cinna arundinacea is a species very likely to be found in bur oak
savannas, as well as other mesic to wet-mesic, intermittently burned
"woodland" types. In my experience, it is less abundant in unburned
forests. Phargmites is essentially a denizen of marshes, a much
wetter and opener system.
James C. Trager
Shaw Arboretum
P.O. Box 38
Gray Summit MO 63039
PH# 314-451-3512
FAX 314-451-5583
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index