This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Farm Bill/Prairie Information


The article below was published in the Iowa Prairie Network newsletter, and
later revised and published in the IOWA SIERRAN.   I've modified it a little
for this listserve.  Please check with me if you want to publish any of this
material elsewhere, but meanwhile, please treat it as sendable email,
especially if you know anyone who might be interested in using the
information to write to Congress.    One letter from a constituent carries
more power than any article, and prairies really need the help.  (I do know
that some people may not agree with all of this article, but I hope that most
prairie enthusiasts can agree with at least some of it.)   THANKS!   

Cindy Hildebrand

***

PRAIRIES AT STAKE IN 2002 FARM BILL

by Cindy Hildebrand

(An earlier version of this article appeared in the Summer 2001 edition of
the Iowa Prairie Network's IPN NEWS.)

Nothing will determine the fate of our surviving native prairies more than
the 2002 Farm Bill. The current farm bill encourages the destruction of
native prairies.  Prairie destruction was not the intention, but it is the
predictable result of incentives built into farm programs.

Farm program incentives are causing prairies to be plowed up and planted to
rowcrops, or damaged by tree and shrub plantings. The question is whether the
next farm bill will provide incentives for prairie protection or prairie
destruction.

Current farm programs, while they sometimes encourage new prairie plantings,
do not protect native (virgin never-plowed) prairies. As the National
Wildlife Federation has pointed out, "No conservation program currently
exists that directly conserves intact native grasslands and their wildlife.
In fact, while grasslands provide a tremendous benefit to society, an intact
native grassland may be the only parcel on a working landscape that is not
eligible to be enrolled in any farm program."

America's native prairies are important natural resources with great public
value. They build soil, store carbon, shelter a rich diversity of wildlife,
harbor rare species, and provide recreational opportunities for millions of
Americans. They are also very important to America's livestock industry. Many
native prairies, in Iowa and elsewhere, are privately owned, and are being
used as pasture, rangeland, or hayland.

Native prairies also have value because of their special capacity to absorb,
store, purify, and gradually release water. Scientists are studying the
unique hydrological qualities of native prairies in order to design better
ways to control floods and prevent water pollution in rural and urban
landscapes.

Prairie plantings have value, but they cannot match the soil structure,
biodiversity, hydrology, and recreational value of native prairies.
Scientists estimate that it would take at least four centuries for planted
prairies to match native prairies in quality.

Prairies once covered much of North America, but are now our most endangered
landscape. Unfortunately, tax-funded farm programs are a major reason why.

The 2002 Farm Bill needs to ensure the sustainability of the nation's
irreplaceable prairie resources by including the following elements:

1. A voluntary Grassland Reserve Program should be established, giving
landowners the opportunity to enroll their lands and receive payment for
permanent or 30-year easements. Priority should be given to native prairies
that provide habitat for rare and declining species, and small prairies
should be eligible as well as large ones. Well-managed grazing and seed
harvest should be allowed where appropriate.   

2. Commodity support programs should be designed so they do not encourage or
result in the conversion of native prairies to cropland.

3. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) should be changed so that
landowners are no longer encouraged to plow up and crop native prairie for
two years in order to qualify the land for enrollment in the CRP.

4. The federal requirement that trees and shrubs be planted on CRP riparian
marginal pastureland should be removed. The requirement causes serious
problems in prairie states like Iowa, where it wastes money, angers
landowners, destroys native prairies, and imperils rare species. On CRP
pastureland, prairie vegetation should be encouraged on prairie soils.

5. All biomass programs should be carefully designed so they do not encourage
or subsidize the plowing of native prairies in order to plant the land to
biomass crops.

6. Conservation programs for working lands should encourage and reward
sustainable grazing and good stewardship on native prairie pastures, hayland,
and rangeland.

7. The CRP and Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) should be made sufficiently
flexible so that state and local officials will have the ability to protect
native prairies by using appropriate seed and management techniques on nearby
CRP and WRP plantings.

8. The Sodbuster compliance provision should be reauthorized and strengthened
so it extends the same protection to prairies and other native plant
communities that Swampbuster extends to wetlands.

9. The Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program, which has helped landowners
protect native prairies, often with the help of state and local matching
funds, should be reauthorized with increased funding.

10. The Farmland Protection Program, which has helped landowners protect
native prairies and other unique farmland from development through permanent
conservation easements, should get full funding and support.

By including native prairie protection in the 2002 Farm Bill, Congress would
help all Americans, as well as our natural resources and our agricultural
economy. Farmers and ranchers who have kept their native prairies intact,
thereby providing benefits to the public, would be economically rewarded
instead of punished. Our serious crop overproduction problem would be
reduced. And future Americans would be able to experience wild native
prairies and discover their special magic.

Prairies are getting little attention in current Farm Bill debates. If you
want to help them, please write to your U.S. senators and congressional
representatives.

(Cindy Hildebrand is a prairie enthusiast who lives near Ames.)

***



Cindy Hildebrand
grantridge@aol.com
57439 250th St.
Ames, IA  50010
515-232-3807

"One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making
exciting discoveries."  (A.A. Milne)


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index