Re: AG Germplasm


In a message dated 04/07/1999 5:00:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
indbio@disknet.com writes:

<< Subj:	 AG Germplasm
 Date:	04/07/1999 5:00:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time
 From:	indbio@disknet.com (Harold Eddleman Ph.D.)
 Sender:	owner-pumpkins@mallorn.com
 Reply-to:	pumpkins@mallorn.com
 To:	pumpkins@mallorn.com
 
 pumpkins@mallorn.com wrote:
 > 
 Eddleman's reply to Brock:
 Eddleman has edited Brock's words to shorten the reply
 > 
 > I have always felt that AG's sibbed (not selfed) seed have at most
 > a 5% potential to hit 700+ lbs.  Only one seed, the 567.5 Mombert, 
 > has surpassed this and is crowned the king of AG seed for its high 
 > rate of 700+ [progeny].   But it seems we [usually] don't see more 
 > than 10 to 12 good 700+ pumpkins from [the 300 seeds in] a good 
 > background AG. -- [That's] not real impressive.
 I have already learned an important lesson from those who have written
 me with themes similar to what Brock expounds above. While I have no
 plans to grow for records, the genetic questions are very interesting
 and I wish I had known in 1954 the genetic lessons this list has taught
 me in only a month. While I try to grow some C. pepo every year for
 pies, keep in mind that I have not yet grown any AG. 
   I am only guessing but I think we should work on developing (by
 sibbing) some great AG germplasm lines. Those AG growers who have the
 space and interest can work at improving those lines and, if willing,
 made the seed available to others. 
   A competitor could then choose 2 lines and cross them to obtain hybrid
 seed for contest plants and progeny test to pick his hybrid for his
 contest crop. I realize folks have already been doing this for decades.
 I suppose the big problem is that an AG plant takes so much space that
 not much culling of runts can take place. How can get more plants to
 select from?
   Most of my corn breeding was also breeding for "show" I was trying to
 grow beautiful flint ears demonstrating genetic traits which teachers
 could use to get kids interested in Mendelian Principles of Genetics. I
 wanted the ears to be so beautiful that the kids would remember the
 principles. 
   My best success came from developing lines by sibbing and then
 crossing for progeny tests. I then grew the winning hybrid in quantity
 to sell to schools. I often got two beautiful ears per plant and
 sometimes 3.
   
 > One problem is there is no fixed number of good seed one could 
 > bank on. But I sometimes feel that I should  attempt to do that. 
 > That after say 4% of good seed has been found by planting and making 
 > it to the scales WE then take  serious notice and go after that 
 > particular cross.  I have always felt that going back after the
 > 1% remaining good seed wasn't the best way to go. I would appreciate 
 > your thoughts on this.
   I may not understand your plan. If you are saying, "Let's try to look
 at the methods available to develop some dependable inbred (prob by
 sibbing) lines, then I agree. 
   I think you are hoping that it will be possible to develop some lines
 which can be crossed to produce big pumpkins every time. I am only
 guessing, but I think that is a good plan with lots of examples of
 success in other crops. 
   As I have written before, present day strawberries have lost some of
 the resistance diseases and insects which are found in some wild plants.
 Some breeders are trying to find good wild plants to start the breeding
 all over again. Examples are Ag Canada at Simcoe and a station in SW
 Washington USA and I was doing it on a smaller scale before I learn
 about the larger government efforts.
   As we try to develop elite sibbed lines, we need to discard plants
 which show susceptibility to disease. We could inoculate the vines with
 disease and use only the survivors. 
 
 > 
 > Some laymen like myself feel that the success of the 567.5 may have
 > been from some sort of Hybrid vigor.
   That is reasonable. Alternatively, it have also have had a lucky
 supply of rare, superior alleles (genes). Keep in mind that at a given
 locus, there might be many different alternative alleles (versions of
 the gene). It often seems that having two copies of the best gene at the
 locus is not as good as having two outstanding different alleles
 (hybrid). Actually, sometimes two inferior alleles complement each other
 somehow to be the best combination. [Such examples are known; the sickle
 cell form of hemoglobin may be one example. It may confer malaria
 survival.]
 
 > This seed was white.  [Thanks, I did not know Mombert 567.5 was white 
 > seeded]. I have 
 > seen two white seed parents create a tan. I have seen two tan seed 
 > parents create a white. Sometimes you can get some that look like a 
 > combo of both tan and white.  Most growers feel that seed color 
 > doesn't tell us much.  But don't know for sure.
   I did not mean to imply that seed color was important. I just thought
 it might be an interesting mutant to study. Since the 750 McIntyre 1998
 seeds are white and finely wrinkled and others say other white AG seeds
 are wrinkled, I wonder whether the mutation is in the seed coat--perhaps
 the normal colored seed coat is missing. 
   When two white seeds are crossed and produce 100% TAN seeds it
 suggests two gene loci are needed to make TAN. If one gene locus makes
 TAN color and another locus makes the outer coat then a defective gene
 in either locus causes white seeds and crossing these two homozygous
 white seeds might produce 100% fruits containing white seeds. If the F1
 is selfed one might expect 9:7 ratio, but result would depend upon
 dominance.
 
 > If a good lineage AG seed doesn't cut it the first few 
 > attempts we are quick to look elsewhere.  Mainly because you put
 > in a great deal of work on a plant and its hard to risk that time
 > on a good cross that has let you down.  But if the ratio is as tough as
 > it appears to hit a 700+ the 5-10 growers that do plant a certain cross
 > and  miss seems like a drop in the bucket.  But this is our practice 
 > and very hard to overcome.  Are we destined to only have these kind 
 > of odds or how can we improve our bets....brock
 
   I think the problem is that the plants take so much space that our
 slections are from too few individuals. If we could make AG commerial so
 we could afford whole fields of them, then we could select from more
 plants. I do not have any solutions at this point. 
   The phenomen of some outstanding plants being great as germplasm and
 other outstanding plants being duds as gene sources is common in all
 crops.
   Selecting the largest ear of corn from a corncrib was somewhat
 successful, but selecting from the field from sibbed plants proved much
 better. It seems to me that choosing your seeds from the winners at a
 weighin is similar to the old low-success practice of picking the
 biggest ear of corn from a crib.
 --
 Harold Eddleman Ph.D. Microbiology and Genetics      
 i*@disknet.com 
 Location: Palmyra IN USA; 36 kilometers west of Louisville, Kentucky
 http://www.disknet.com/indiana_biolab/pk.htm
 
 
 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
 message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
 
 
 ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
 Return-Path: <owner-pumpkins@mallorn.com>
 Received: from  rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (rly-zc02.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.2]) by 
air-zc03.mail.aol.com (v59.4) with SMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 1999 16:59:11 -0400
 Received: from lorien.mallorn.com (lorien.mallorn.com [198.88.188.30])
 	  by rly-zc02.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
 	  with ESMTP id QAA23664;
 	  Wed, 7 Apr 1999 16:59:05 -0400 (EDT)
 Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
 	by lorien.mallorn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA32323;
 	Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:42:38 -0500
 Received: from valinor.mallorn.com (IDENT:root@valinor.mallorn.com 
[198.88.188.73])
 	by lorien.mallorn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA32318
 	for <pumpkins@mallorn.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:42:37 -0500
 Received: from BBS.DISKNET.COM (disknet.com [206.246.165.9])
 	by valinor.mallorn.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA12419
 	for <pumpkins@mallorn.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:42:29 -0500
 X-ROUTED: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 16:44:16 -0500
 X-TCP-IDENTITY: Indbio
 Received: from tty10.disknet.com [206.246.165.41] by BBS.DISKNET.COM with 
smtp
 	id BACLCFED ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 16:43:38 -0500
 Message-ID: <370BF5A0.3FD8@disknet.com>
 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 17:17:36 -0700
 From: "Harold Eddleman Ph.D." <indbio@disknet.com>
 Organization: Indiana Biolab
 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win16; I)
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
 Subject: AG Germplasm
 References: <tcppop3.889470@BBS.DISKNET.COM>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 X-md5sum: 867be69f7de4d0bc16f8bc734de4f6ac
 X-md5sum-Origin: valinor.mallorn.com
 Sender: owner-pumpkins@mallorn.com
 Precedence: bulk
 Reply-To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
 
  >>
Hello Harold.  You sure are a wealth information, nice to have you on the 
list.  I was wondering, what is the weight of the largest pumpkin you've ever 
grown? Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index