Re: WINNER in 2nd annual pumpkin poetry contest
- Subject: Re: WINNER in 2nd annual pumpkin poetry contest
- From: vince a*@yahoo.com
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:26:17 -0800 (PST)
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/> (Web Archive)
Keep in mind that I used special criteria for judging these
poems. First they had to be about pumpkin growing, second they
could'nt be too serious, and third they had to be well amended
with manure. These same criteria I also use out in my pumpkin
patch.
What better criteria to use for judging a pumpkin poem?.... and
don't underestimate the Power of PooP. Pumpkins thrive on it.
The winning poems also had to pass the sniff test. To learn
more about the sniff test go here:
http://home.pacbell.net/diana_do/monkeysniff.htm
So Luc, you are correct, the winning poems are shit... but shit
is good! - When you begin to fully comprehend this you will
start to grow bigger pumpkins...
vince
--- Luc Bex <lbx@pandora.be> wrote:
> List,
>
> With all respect, but in my opinion the winning poems are
> shit. I did saw here a lot of better poems.
> I believe that the jury or great pumpkinfreaks, but from
> poetry they do'nt know a thing.
>
> Blow up this thing.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Luc Bex
> Belgium (Europ)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumpkin-growing archives: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
