This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
October Survey results
- To: p*@athenet.net
- Subject: October Survey results
- From: E* M* <e*@vt.edu>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 19:29:41 +0500
Hello,
I know I promised you these a while ago so without further delay here you
go.
The survey itself turned out to be a sham. The questions I asked did not
really apply the way I thought they would. The one useful thing I was trying
to come up with was a formula to predict the largest pumpkin you could grow
in a given area.
In my orginal data the formula came out like this:
pumpkin size in lbs=0.0602(garden size insqft)+ 149.2270 with a 63% chance of
this happening.
This really isn't much more than a 50/50 chance so I devided the number of
plants into the garden size and recieved this little better formula:
pumpkin size in lbs=0.1427(garden size in sqft)+ 142.7379 with a 75% chance
of it happening.
I think we can get a better correlation by asking everyone to tell their
largest pumpkin size and the area used to grow this particular pumpkin.
I will ask this question when everyone returns for the growing season.
Other than that here are a few stats from the survey.
83% grow AG
90% don't compete in gardening competitions.
6% have secrets they are holding from the group.
83% have three or fewer years growing pumpkins.
By using my secret formula I was able to decipher the following:
10% have either thought of or actually sabotaged someone elses
patch.(Remember there are lies, damn lies and statistics)
THANKS AGAIN to all who helped!
Happy New Year,
Mr Fool
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index