Re: mail filters


In a message dated 7/2/99 10:48:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
pthompson@glgt.com writes:

> Even though I don't agree with it, I support Bart's decision to filter out
>  Steve's messages. Everyone has the right to filter out messages any way 
they
>  want. However, to do so publicly with such harsh language ("darken my email
>  mailbox") is not good social behavior. Added to that, to drag someone
>  (Narik) into the fray who had nothing to do with the issue at hand shows 
the
>  real purpose of the posting was to elevate the ego of the writer.
>  
>  It was unnecessary and mean-spirited.
>  
>  Paul Thompson
>  Armada, Michigan
>  

Well, personally, I wouldn't mind the attack if he JUST MENTIONED what he was 
so upset about, specifically, where he has to block my mail! Did I miss 
something?!
I even went back through my posts and could find nothing that would cause 
someone to want to block my mail! Man alive! What, I said in a post how I 
think pesticides are overused, and can do more harm than good sometimes? 
Could that possibly make someone ANGRY?! That is a SCARY thought.
"WHAT CHEMICAL CAN I USE FOR APHIDS?"
"You don't need to use poison for a few aphids, pesticides are overused in 
this way, which causes more harm than good. Don't worry just try soap or 
water spray"
"SHUT THE H*LL UP, YOUR REPLY WAS NOT APPRECIATED! I'LL USE ALL THE POISINS I 
WANT ON MY LAND, IT'S NONE OF YOUR D*MN BUSINESS. I'M BLOCKING YOUR EMAILS 
FROM NOW ON!"

(O.K., I don't know if it was the same guy, but still I wish someone would 
fill me in on what I said that was offensive, that would make someone have to 
block my emails which are "darkening" their mailbox! Someone PLEASE FILL ME 
IN!)

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index