This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
FW: accuracy of weight charts
- To: p*@athenet.net
- Subject: FW: accuracy of weight charts
- From: D* G* <d*@athenet.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:21:56 -0500
>X-Sender: dgs@pobox1.stanford.edu (Unverified)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 18:12:43 -0700
>To: pumpkins@athenet.net
>From: Dan Shapiro <dgs@leland.stanford.edu>
>Subject: weight charts
>
>I just wanted to report that Marcellus' weight chart was *amazingly*
>accurate. It pegged the size of my largest pumpkin (Bertha) exactly to the
>pound!
>
>Actually, I measured it a day before picking, and the projected weight
>*including one day's worth of growth* precisely equalled the weight on the
>half moon bay scale.
>
>Personally, I think it was the Greer 946.5 seed. The plant was like a
>convenient baby; it ran when it was supposed to run, it produced female
>flowers at exactly the right moment, and it self-pruned to two pumpkins,
>which grew stem down so that I didn't even need to support the vines. And
>while I wasn't looking, the plant read Marcellus' chart.
>
>Optimists on the left, pessimists on the right.... does this mean next year
>will be easy or hard?
>
> Dan Shapiro <dgs@leland.stanford.edu>
>
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index