Re: INDIANA STATE RECORD

Bruce,
 
I don't understand how the decision of the judges at Hubers Weigh off affect the IPGA'S credibility. Unless:
 
you where a judge
Hubers is part of the IPGA
Judges at Hubers didn't know what they were looking for
 
By the sounds of it, the fruit wasn't sound or it was sound and was damaged putting it on the scale and the judges didn't inspect it throughly, but if there is no connection between Hubers and the IPGA, you cannot reverse a decision made at another weigh off and I see no way it effects your organization's credibility.
 
Tom's record should stand and by you saying you won't recognize it does your organization more harm and correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think any organization has governing powers on whether a fruit is a record or not.
 
The only question mark(credibility factor) will fall on Huber's Weigh off and not on the IPGA.
 
Tom congradulations on the New Indiana State Record 1097.5 pounds.
 
andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: b*@prodigy.net
To: p*@hort.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:21 PM
Subject: INDIANA STATE RECORD

 

Dear Growers,
 
    The IPGA Board has came to a decision on Tom Beachy's New state record. We will not be recognizing this as the new record . Our ruling has been a hard decision . Tom is one of the top
growers in  Indiana & the first 1000+ in state .  Under the rules this pumpkin passed an intial
inspection but it started leaking pumpkin juice on the scale. This we feel as a group is not a sound fruit. The weight was recorded at HUBERS weigh-off & won first prize. The judges at the show allowed the weight to stand at the show. As a fairly new growers association we do not want the integrity or credability of our group to be comprimised with the "judges" decision making. Hopefully all will understand our decision at this time.
 
Thanks,
Bruce Gatewood
President  IPGA 
 b*@prodigy.net
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index