This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Natural Life Magazine #61 - Saving Seed Becomes Illegal
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: Natural Life Magazine #61 - Saving Seed Becomes Illegal
- From: m*@cvtv.net (Cindy Meredith)
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:50:27 -0500
- References: <l03010d00b1ebe962208a@[205.241.43.157]>
- Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"JG-UQ1.0.im2.rkcnr"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
I think "conventionally-bred seed" means non-hybrid. They must think they
can insert the gene in even "conventional" seed that makes the next
generation seed non-viable. I guess we'll have to be even more diligent and
careful saving and sharing our seed.
Cindy In TX
>I agree with you, Cindy. I've been saving and sharing seed for years.
>This article doesn't really change anything for me. What is worrisome is the
>phrase "conventionally-bred seed". Wonder what that means??
>Caron
>
>Cindy Meredith wrote:
>
>> Already seed from hybrid vegetables and flowers is useless to seedsavers.
>> And, there are already patented plants in the flower and vegetable
>> category. Most seed saving is done by gardeners now, not farmers growing
>> large acreage of crops. I agree the impeneding legislation is worrying, and
>> likely the look of the future, but seed savers and sharers will always be
>> around.
>>
>> Cindy in TX
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index